Difference
(major diff, author diff)
Added Changed Deleted

  • Prior minor revision
  • Current Revision



     
     
     
    Some philosophers, notably of the Platonic school, contend that all nouns refer
    to entities. Other philosophers contend that some nouns do not name entities but
    provide a kind of shorthand way of referring to a collection (of either objects
    or events). In this latter view, mind, instead of referring to an entity,
    instead refers to a collection of mental events experienced by a person;
    society, instead of referring to an entity, refers to a collection of persons
    with some shared characteristics; and geometry, instead of referring to an
    entity, refers to a collection of a specific kind of intellectual activity. Any
     
    == Some basic questions ==
     
     
    This highlights one of the problems of the philosophical approach--it it
    relies on continued investigation of categories, and has no clear way to stop
    asking. Whereas, in theology and library science and artificial intelligence,
    one typically adopts a relatively stable foundation ontology. This reflects a
    larger cosmology, and probably morals, aesthetic, examples or stories; all of
    which can set foundational priorities. In theology this derives from a religion
    and its (relatively) stable doctrines.
     
    '''Further examples of ontological questions include:'''
     
    *What is existence?
     
    *What are physical objects?
     
    *What are the essential as opposed to merely accidental, attributes of a given object?
     
    *What constitutes the Identity of an object?
     
    *Can one give an account of what it means to say that a physical object exists?
     
    *What are an object's properties or relations and how are they related to the object itself?
     
    *Is existence a property?
     
    *When does an object go out of existence? as opposed to merely changing?
     
    *'''[Deoxy:koan/82 Why does something exist rather than nothing?]'''