|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some philosophers, notably of the Platonic school, contend that all nouns refer |
to entities. Other philosophers contend that some nouns do not name entities but |
provide a kind of shorthand way of referring to a collection (of either objects |
or events). In this latter view, mind, instead of referring to an entity, |
instead refers to a collection of mental events experienced by a person; |
society, instead of referring to an entity, refers to a collection of persons |
with some shared characteristics; and geometry, instead of referring to an |
entity, refers to a collection of a specific kind of intellectual activity. Any |
|
|
|
|
|
As a philosophical subject, ontology chiefly deals with the precise utilization of words as descriptors of entities or realities. Any ontology must give an account of which words refer to entities, which do not, why, and what categories result. When one applies this process to nouns such as electrons, energy, promise, happiness, time, truth, causality, and god, ontology becomes fundamental to many branches of philosophy. |
|
== Some basic questions == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
relies on continued investigation of categories, and has no clear way to stop |
asking. Whereas, in theology and library science and artificial intelligence, |
one typically adopts a relatively stable foundation ontology. This reflects a |
|
which can set foundational priorities. In theology this derives from a religion |
and its (relatively) stable doctrines. |
|
'''Further examples of ontological questions include:''' |
|
*What is existence? |
|
*What are physical objects? |
|
|
|
*What constitutes the Identity of an object? |
|
*Can one give an account of what it means to say that a physical object exists? |
|
*What are an object's properties or relations and how are they related to the object itself? |
|
*Is existence a property? |
|
|
|
|