| Difference (minor diff, author diff) |
|
,, |
<table width="200" style="margin:28px;float:right;"><tr><td align="justify"> |
"'''97–98% of the climate researchers''' most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC (Wikipedia:Anthropogenic_Climate_Change) outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change"--~~''[http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/06/04/1003187107.full.pdf+html Expert credibility in climate change] ^PDF^''~~ |
</td></tr></table> |
,, |
,, |
<ul> +++"'''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change#Surveys_of_scientists_and_scientific_literature There is OVERWHELMING scientific consensus that greenhouse gases emitted by human activity are causing global average temperatures to rise.]''' Conservative think tanks are trying to undermine this conclusion with a disinformation campaign employing “reports” designed to look like a counterbalance to peer-reviewed studies & skeptic propaganda masquerading as journalism."+++--[http://motherjones.com/environment/2005/05/some-it-hot Some Like It Hot] ]]] |
[[[ +++"'''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_climate_change_science There is OVERWHELMING scientific consensus that greenhouse gases emitted by human activity are causing global average temperatures to rise.]''' Conservative think tanks are trying to undermine this conclusion with a disinformation campaign employing “reports” designed to look like a counterbalance to peer-reviewed studies & skeptic propaganda masquerading as journalism."+++--[http://motherjones.com/environment/2005/05/some-it-hot Some Like It Hot] ]]] |
,, |
<table width="200" style="margin:28px;float:right;"><tr><td align="justify"> |
"The debate on the authenticity of global warming and the role played by human activity is largely __'''nonexistent'''__ among those who understand the nuances and scientific basis of long-term climate processes."--~~''[http://tigger.uic.edu/~pdoran/012009_Doran_final.pdf Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change] ^PDF^''~~ |
</td></tr></table> |
,, |
;'''++[http://motherjones.com/special-reports/2009/12/dirty-dozen-climate-change-denial The Dirty Dozen of the Climate Change Denial]++''':A guide to the loudest components and their employees direct a web of the climate disinformation machine. special interest groups and think-tanks, with a strong focus on fighting environmental regulation, opposing clean energy legislation, and easing limits on industrial pollution. |
;'''[http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Exxon-Funded_Skeptics Exxon-Funded Skeptics]''':The Exxon corporation has long been involved in creating confusion regarding global warming and the creation and funding of Global warming skeptics. |
<news feed="exxon"> |
</big><br clear="all"> |
<big>,, |
,, |
"'''Climate change denial''' has been so effective because the [Local:Ingenious_Ways_To_Avoid_Believing_Climate_Change “denial community”] has mischaracterized the necessarily guarded language of serious scientific dialogue as vagueness and uncertainty. Mainstream media outlets, attacked for being biased, help lend credence to skeptics’ views, regardless of their scientific integrity, by giving them relatively equal standing with legitimate scientists. <no>ExxonMobil</no> is responsible for much of this bogus scientific “debate” and the demand for what the deniers cynically refer to as “sound science.”--~~~[http://snowe.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=9acba744-802a-23ad-47be-2683985c724e Senators Demand that the World’s Largest Oil Maker Make Public Its History of Funding Climate Change “Skeptics”]~~~ |
,, |
,, |
<news feed="crock"> |
<news feed="crockv"> |
<news feed="zombies"> |
,, |
,, |
"'''<no>ExxonMobil</no> has spent more than $19 million since the late 1990s on a strategy of “information laundering,”''' or enabling a small number of professional skeptics working through scientific-sounding organizations to funnel their viewpoints through non-peer-reviewed websites...The Internet has provided <no>ExxonMobil</no> the means to wreak its havoc on U.S. credibility, while avoiding the rigors of refereed journals. While deniers can easily post something calling into question the scientific consensus on climate change, not a single refereed article in more than a decade has sought to refute it. Indeed, while the group of outliers funded by <no>ExxonMobil</no> has had some success in the court of public opinion, it has failed miserably in confusing, much less convincing, the legitimate scientific community."--~~~[http://snowe.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=9acba744-802a-23ad-47be-2683985c724e Senators Demand that the World’s Largest Oil Maker Make Public Its History of Funding Climate Change “Skeptics”]~~~ |
,, |
,, |
<news feed="ucsgw"> |
,, |
,, |
++"'''In light of the adverse impacts still resulting from your corporation’s activities,''' we must request that <no>ExxonMobil</no> end any further financial assistance or other support to groups or individuals whose public advocacy has contributed to the small, but unfortunately effective, '''climate change denial myth.'''"++--~~~[http://snowe.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=9acba744-802a-23ad-47be-2683985c724e Senators Demand that the World’s Largest Oil Maker Make Public Its History of Funding Climate Change “Skeptics”]~~~ |
,, |
,, |
<news feed="realclimate"> |
<news feed="ecoshock"> |
</big>,, |
,, |
<html><a href="http://motherjones.com/special-reports/2005/05/world-burns"><img src="http://deoxy.org/img/worldburns.jpg" style="width:100%" border="0"></a></html> |