Difference
(minor diff, author diff)
Added Changed Deleted

  • Prior major revision
  • Current Revision



    ,,
    <table width="200" style="margin:28px;float:right;"><tr><td align="justify">
    "'''97–98% of the climate researchers''' most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC (Wikipedia:Anthropogenic_Climate_Change) outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change"--~~''[http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/06/04/1003187107.full.pdf+html Expert credibility in climate change] ^PDF^''~~
    </td></tr></table>
    ,,
    ,,
    ,,
    <table width="200" style="margin:28px;float:right;"><tr><td align="justify">
    "The debate on the authenticity of global warming and the role played by human activity is largely __'''nonexistent'''__ among those who understand the nuances and scientific basis of long-term climate processes."--~~''[http://tigger.uic.edu/~pdoran/012009_Doran_final.pdf Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change] ^PDF^''~~
    </td></tr></table>
    ,,
     
     
     
    ;'''[http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Exxon-Funded_Skeptics Exxon-Funded Skeptics]''':The Exxon corporation has long been involved in creating confusion regarding global warming and the creation and funding of Global warming skeptics.
     
    <news feed="exxon">
    </big><br clear="all">
    #MAGIC Videx q="denial OR ExxonMobil OR (Inconvenient Truth 2)"
    <big>,,
    ,,
    "'''Climate change denial''' has been so effective because the [Local:Ingenious_Ways_To_Avoid_Believing_Climate_Change “denial community”] has mischaracterized the necessarily guarded language of serious scientific dialogue as vagueness and uncertainty. Mainstream media outlets, attacked for being biased, help lend credence to skeptics’ views, regardless of their scientific integrity, by giving them relatively equal standing with legitimate scientists. <no>ExxonMobil</no> is responsible for much of this bogus scientific “debate” and the demand for what the deniers cynically refer to as “sound science.”--~~~[http://snowe.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=9acba744-802a-23ad-47be-2683985c724e Senators Demand that the World’s Largest Oil Maker Make Public Its History of Funding Climate Change “Skeptics”]~~~
    ,,
    ,,
    <news feed="crock">
    <news feed="crockv">
    <news feed="zombies">
    ,,
    ,,
    "'''<no>ExxonMobil</no> has spent more than $19 million since the late 1990s on a strategy of “information laundering,”''' or enabling a small number of professional skeptics working through scientific-sounding organizations to funnel their viewpoints through non-peer-reviewed websites...The Internet has provided <no>ExxonMobil</no> the means to wreak its havoc on U.S. credibility, while avoiding the rigors of refereed journals. While deniers can easily post something calling into question the scientific consensus on climate change, not a single refereed article in more than a decade has sought to refute it. Indeed, while the group of outliers funded by <no>ExxonMobil</no> has had some success in the court of public opinion, it has failed miserably in confusing, much less convincing, the legitimate scientific community."--~~~[http://snowe.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=9acba744-802a-23ad-47be-2683985c724e Senators Demand that the World’s Largest Oil Maker Make Public Its History of Funding Climate Change “Skeptics”]~~~
    ,,
    ,,
    <news feed="ucsgw">
    ,,
    ,,
    ++"'''In light of the adverse impacts still resulting from your corporation’s activities,''' we must request that <no>ExxonMobil</no> end any further financial assistance or other support to groups or individuals whose public advocacy has contributed to the small, but unfortunately effective, '''climate change denial myth.'''"++--~~~[http://snowe.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=9acba744-802a-23ad-47be-2683985c724e Senators Demand that the World’s Largest Oil Maker Make Public Its History of Funding Climate Change “Skeptics”]~~~
    ,,
    ,,
    <news feed="ecoshock">
    </big>,,
    ,,
    <html><a href="http://motherjones.com/special-reports/2005/05/world-burns"><img src="http://deoxy.org/img/worldburns.jpg" style="width:100%" border="0"></a></html>